AI Visibility Rankingscheck your product

AI coding assistants

Claude Code vs Cursor

as AI assistants see them, week of 2026-09-14

brag about it: X · LinkedIn

Cursor comes out ahead of Claude Code overall, scoring 66 to Claude Code's 43. Cursor is also named more often, appearing in 57 of 70 answers versus 40 of 70 for Claude Code. Head-to-head, Cursor is named more often on 13 questions, Claude Code on 2, with 5 ties. Cursor sweeps top billing for coding agents that work across a whole codebase and for the best free AI coding assistants (4 of 4 each), while Claude Code is named in every answer about top AI coding assistants in 2026 and best tools for writing tests. Neither is ever named for the best locally-run assistant for privacy.

Head to head

metricClaude CodeCursor
score4366
questions won1618

By assistant

Claude Code

assistantscorenamed in, this weekusual spot, this week
ChatGPT4965% of answers#3.2
Claude5375% of answers#3.8
Gemini510% of answers#8.0
Perplexity4655% of answers#2.3

Cursor

assistantscorenamed in, this weekusual spot, this week
ChatGPT7190% of answers#2.8
Claude5675% of answers#3.2
Gemini90100% of answers#1.7
Perplexity6170% of answers#2.0

Where they differ

Only Claude Code gets named for

  • What's the best AI coding assistant that works in the terminal?

Only Cursor gets named for

  • What are the best free AI coding assistants?
  • What's the best AI coding assistant for beginners learning to code?
  • What's the best open-source AI coding assistant?

More comparisons

Not sold on either?

Scores count how often each assistant names a product, weighted by position. How the score works · Full AI coding assistants leaderboard