AI Visibility Rankingscheck your product

AI presentation makers

Beautiful.ai vs Gamma

as AI assistants see them, week of 2026-09-21

brag about it: X · LinkedIn

Gamma is the one AI assistants keep reaching for: an overall score of 79 versus Beautiful.ai's 48, and a presence in 56 of 60 answers compared with 40 of 60. Head-to-head, Gamma is named more often on 12 questions, Beautiful.ai on just 1, with 7 ties. Both show up consistently for "best AI slide deck generator" and "best for a team or agency," and both go quiet on tracking who viewed a deck. Beautiful.ai also never appears for interactive, web-based, or PDF-to-deck questions. ChatGPT rates Gamma highest at 91; Beautiful.ai's best score is also from ChatGPT, at 69.

Head to head

metricBeautiful.aiGamma
score4879
questions won1719

By assistant

Beautiful.ai

assistantscorenamed in, this weekusual spot, this week
ChatGPT6985% of answers#2.6
Claude4365% of answers#4.3
Gemininot sampled this week
Perplexity3450% of answers#4.2

Gamma

assistantscorenamed in, this weekusual spot, this week
ChatGPT9195% of answers#1.3
Claude7895% of answers#2.4
Gemininot sampled this week
Perplexity7190% of answers#2.8

Where they differ

Only Beautiful.ai gets named for

nothing exclusive

Only Gamma gets named for

  • What's the best tool to turn a document or PDF into a presentation?
  • What's the best tool to make an interactive or web-based presentation?

More comparisons

Not sold on either?

Scores count how often each assistant names a product, weighted by position. How the score works · Full AI presentation makers leaderboard