AthenaHQ vs Conductor

as AI assistants see them, week of 2026-10-12

brag about it: X · LinkedIn

AthenaHQ edges out Conductor in how AI assistants talk about them right now. AthenaHQ scores 11 overall versus Conductor's 7, with the gap showing up across ChatGPT (6 vs 0), Claude (23 vs 20), and Perplexity (5 vs 4). AthenaHQ is named in 14 of 61 answers, Conductor in 11 of 61. Head-to-head, AthenaHQ comes out ahead on 5 questions, Conductor on 2, and they tie on 13. AthenaHQ shows up most for tools that track AI visibility or share of voice against competitors, while Conductor's strongest showing is for enterprise AI visibility platforms, named in 2 of 3 answers. Neither is ever named for startup-budget, alert, or open-source tracking questions.

Head to head

metric	AthenaHQ	Conductor
score	10	8
questions won	14	16

By assistant

AthenaHQ

assistant	score	named in, this week	usual spot, this week
ChatGPT	8	15% of answers	#4.7
Claude	19	30% of answers	#8.5
Gemini	not sampled this week
Perplexity	4	5% of answers	#4.0

Conductor

assistant	score	named in, this week	usual spot, this week
ChatGPT	0	0% of answers
Claude	21	55% of answers	#11.5
Gemini	not sampled this week
Perplexity	6	10% of answers	#3.0

Where they differ

Only AthenaHQ gets named for

What's the best AI visibility tool for a small startup budget?
What are the best free or cheap AI visibility tools?

Only Conductor gets named for

Which AI search tracking tool gives the most actionable recommendations?
What's the best AI visibility tool with an API or data export?
Which tool best tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude?
What's the best tool for an agency tracking AI visibility for many clients?

More comparisons

Not sold on either?

Scores count how often each assistant names a product, weighted by position. How the score works · Full AI visibility trackers leaderboard