AI Visibility Rankingscheck your product

Transactional email APIs

Loops vs Plunk

as AI assistants see them, week of 2026-09-28

brag about it: X · LinkedIn

Loops and Plunk both sit low in AI assistants' rankings, but Loops comes out ahead. Loops scores 4 overall (ChatGPT 3, Claude 11, Perplexity 0) and gets named in 6 of 62 answers, compared to Plunk's overall score of 1 (ChatGPT 0, Claude 4, Perplexity 0) and 3 of 62 answers. Loops shows up most for React or JSX email templates (2 of 3 answers), while Plunk's best showing is just 1 mention each across a few questions. Head to head, Loops leads on 3 questions, Plunk on 1, with 16 ties. Neither is named for deliverability, cost, or self-hosting questions.

Head to head

metricLoopsPlunk
score41
questions won53

By assistant

Loops

assistantscorenamed in, this weekusual spot, this week
ChatGPT35% of answers#6.0
Claude1125% of answers#9.8
Gemininot sampled this week
Perplexity00% of answers

Plunk

assistantscorenamed in, this weekusual spot, this week
ChatGPT00% of answers
Claude410% of answers#11.5
Gemininot sampled this week
Perplexity00% of answers

Where they differ

Only Loops gets named for

  • What's the best email API with React or JSX email templates?
  • What's the best alternative to SendGrid?
  • What's the best email API in 2026?

Only Plunk gets named for

  • Which transactional email provider has the best developer experience?

More comparisons

Not sold on either?

Scores count how often each assistant names a product, weighted by position. How the score works · Full Transactional email APIs leaderboard